12/15/2023 0 Comments Lights out 2 on direct tv![]() ![]() DirecTV has also balked at paying for the same content that streams to users for free on other platforms, such as Roku.īut Newsmax - and Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill - have advanced a wholly different narrative, one unsupported by the facts in the case. DirecTV has refused, saying that it does not want to pass on added costs to its subscribers for a channel that a small percentage of viewers actually watch. “Put simply, this is a typical business dispute that has nothing to do with ideology, politics or censorship – despite unfounded accusations to the contrary by Newsmax, its CEO, its commentators and others,” DirecTV said.Īt the center of the dispute: Newsmax has demanded DirecTV pay millions in carriage fees to continue including the channel in its lineup. Sign up for the daily digest chronicling the evolving media landscape here. In a letter sent to prominent Jewish Newsmax supporters who had expressed concern about the matter, DirecTV effectively accused the network of waging a dishonest pressure campaign against the company that mischaracterized a run-of-the-mill carriage dispute as a nefarious act of anti-conservative censorship.Ī version of this article first appeared in the “Reliable Sources” newsletter. ![]() The satellite carrier, which refuses to buckle to pressure and pay millions of dollars to broadcast the network’s low-rated programming, unleashed on the right-wing talk channel on Tuesday. All niceties have been thrown out the window as DirecTV finds itself ensnared in an ugly carriage dispute with Newsmax. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |